1910.1026(d): Chromium (VI) Exposure Determination
Employers covered by the chromium (VI) standard must determine each exposed employee's 8-hour TWA exposure, using either the scheduled monitoring option or the option in paragraph (d)(3). Under scheduled monitoring, initial sampling is done per shift, job and area, with periodic monitoring at least every six months at or above the action level and at least every three months above the PEL, and more monitoring after changes.
Key takeaways
- 1910.1026(d) is part of OSHA's general industry standards (29 CFR Part 1910).
- OSHA cited it 252 times in the last 3 years, in 246 inspections, with $379,669 in current penalties.
- 1 death is linked to inspections that cited this rule.
- Most citations: MI (25), PA (25), MN (23).
- Related part: 1910.1026(d)(1) General (172 citations).
- Free 5-minute toolbox talk for your crew below.
In this article
What this rule covers
29 CFR 1910.1026(d) ("Exposure determination") is one requirement inside 1910.1026 Chromium (VI), an OSHA general industry standard (Part 1910). It includes 16 sub-paragraphs. The official text below is copied word for word from the Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR). The numbers, injury cases and training on this page show how OSHA enforces it on real job sites.
Official text
(d) Exposure determination — 252 citations
(1) General. Each employer who has a workplace or work operation covered by this section shall determine the 8-hour TWA exposure for each employee exposed to chromium (VI). This determination shall be made in accordance with either paragraph (d)(2) or paragraph (d)(3) of this section. Open (d)(1) 172 citations
(2) Scheduled monitoring option. Open (d)(2) 73 citations
(i) The employer shall perform initial monitoring to determine the 8-hour TWA exposure for each employee on the basis of a sufficient number of personal breathing zone air samples to accurately characterize full shift exposure on each shift, for each job classification, in each work area. Where an employer does representative sampling instead of sampling all employees in order to meet this requirement, the employer shall sample the employee(s) expected to have the highest chromium (VI) exposures. Open (d)(2)(i) 57 citations
(ii) If initial monitoring indicates that employee exposures are below the action level, the employer may discontinue monitoring for those employees whose exposures are represented by such monitoring.
(iii) If monitoring reveals employee exposures to be at or above the action level, the employer shall perform periodic monitoring at least every six months. 5 citations
(iv) If monitoring reveals employee exposures to be above the PEL, the employer shall perform periodic monitoring at least every three months. Open (d)(2)(iv) 6 citations
(v) If periodic monitoring indicates that employee exposures are below the action level, and the result is confirmed by the result of another monitoring taken at least seven days later, the employer may discontinue the monitoring for those employees whose exposures are represented by such monitoring. 1 citations
(vi) The employer shall perform additional monitoring when there has been any change in the production process, raw materials, equipment, personnel, work practices, or control methods that may result in new or additional exposures to chromium (VI), or when the employer has any reason to believe that new or additional exposures have occurred. 4 citations
(3) Performance-oriented option. The employer shall determine the 8-hour TWA exposure for each employee on the basis of any combination of air monitoring data, historical monitoring data, or objective data sufficient to accurately characterize employee exposure to chromium (VI). Open (d)(3)
(4) Employee notification of determination results. 7 citations
(i) Within 15 work days after making an exposure determination in accordance with paragraph (d)(2) or paragraph (d)(3) of this section, the employer shall individually notify each affected employee in writing of the results of that determination or post the results in an appropriate location accessible to all affected employees. 4 citations
(ii) Whenever the exposure determination indicates that employee exposure is above the PEL, the employer shall describe in the written notification the corrective action being taken to reduce employee exposure to or below the PEL. 3 citations
(5) Accuracy of measurement. Where air monitoring is performed to comply with the requirements of this section, the employer shall use a method of monitoring and analysis that can measure chromium (VI) to within an accuracy of plus or minus 25 percent (±25%) and can produce accurate measurements to within a statistical confidence level of 95 percent for airborne concentrations at or above the action level.
(6) Observation of monitoring.
(i) Where air monitoring is performed to comply with the requirements of this section, the employer shall provide affected employees or their designated representatives an opportunity to observe any monitoring of employee exposure to chromium (VI).
(ii) When observation of monitoring requires entry into an area where the use of protective clothing or equipment is required, the employer shall provide the observer with clothing and equipment and shall assure that the observer uses such clothing and equipment and complies with all other applicable safety and health procedures.
Source: eCFR, text current as of 2026-10-15. Read all of 1910.1026.
Injuries linked to this rule
1 death is linked to inspections where OSHA cited 1910.1026(d).
At 10:00 a.m. on February 23, 2024, an employee working as a machine operator for an aircraft parts manufacturer was working in the fabrication department. The employee inhaled plastic dust which led to the employee developing pneumonia. At 9:00 a.m. on May 2, 2024, the…
Where and how often it was cited
| Year | Citations |
|---|---|
| 2023 | 13 |
| 2024 | 93 |
| 2025 | 94 |
| 2026 | 52 |
Top states: MI (25), PA (25), MN (23), IL (22), FL (18)
Largest penalties
| Employer | Location | Penalty for this rule |
|---|---|---|
| ICS, INC. | WAHPETON, ND | $14,063 |
| AVANTOR, INC. | CHESTER, CT | $12,278 |
| MOUNTAIN MEADOWS LAMB CORPORATION | DENVER, CO | $12,059 |
| QUALITY MANUFACTURING CORP. | URBANDALE, IA | $10,050 |
| AERSALE COMPONENTS SOLUTIONS | RIO RANCHO, NM | $9,643 |
Free toolbox talk
A 5-minute crew talk on 1910.1026(d), plus alerts when this rule changes. Free.
OSHA interpretation letters
- Clarification of monitoring and sampling requirements for hexavalent chromium. (2010-09-30)
- Use of "objective data" to accurately characterize employee exposures to hexavalent chromium during welding operations (2006-11-14)
Related parts of this rule
- 1910.1026(d)(1) General 172 citations
- 1910.1026(d)(2) Scheduled monitoring option 73 citations
- 1910.1026(d)(2)(i) 57 citations
- 1910.1026(d)(2)(iv) 6 citations
- 1910.1026(d)(3) Performance-oriented option
Get your crew competent
Trainers on Black Belt Safety: Marc Harvey, Dana Reyes
Trainers and suppliers: feature your business on this rule for $25/month.
Frequently asked questions
How often must chromium (VI) be monitored under the scheduled option?
At least every six months if exposures are at or above the action level, and at least every three months if above the PEL.
When can monitoring stop?
When initial monitoring is below the action level, or when periodic results below the action level are confirmed by another monitoring taken at least seven days later.
Who is sampled in representative sampling?
The employee(s) expected to have the highest chromium (VI) exposures.
About this page
Sources
- 29 CFR 1910.1026 (eCFR), text current as of 2026-10-15
- U.S. Department of Labor enforcement data: OSHA inspections, citations and accident records, copied nightly; data as of 2026-10-20
3-year window. Federal OSHA only; state-plan rules are not counted. Plain-language text is a summary, not legal advice; the official text controls. Black Belt Safety is not part of OSHA or the Department of Labor.
