29 CFR 1910 · General Industry

1910.1052(k)(1)(iii): Hazard Communication for Methylene Chloride

By Black Belt Safety Editorial Team Official text as of octubre 15, 2026 Data updated noviembre 6, 2026 3 min read

In plain words:

Employers must include methylene chloride (MC) in their hazard communication program, give each employee access to MC container labels and safety data sheets, and train employees under the HCS and the MC standard.

Key takeaways

  • 1910.1052(k)(1)(iii) is part of OSHA's general industry standards (29 CFR Part 1910).
  • OSHA cited it 13 times in the last 3 years, in 13 inspections, with $13,000 in current penalties.
  • Most citations: MI (3), PA (3), MD (2).
  • Related part: 1910.1052(k)(1) Hazard communication—general (17 citations).
  • Free 5-minute toolbox talk for your crew below.

Get the free 5-minute toolbox talk on 1910.1052(k)(1)(iii) ↓

13citations, 3 years
$13,000current penalties
13inspections
0linked injury cases
In this article
  1. What this rule covers
  2. Official text
  3. Where and how often it was cited
  4. Free toolbox talk
  5. OSHA interpretation letters
  6. Related parts of this rule
  7. Get your crew competent
  8. Frequently asked questions
  9. About this page

What this rule covers

29 CFR 1910.1052(k)(1)(iii) is one requirement inside 1910.1052 Methylene chloride, an OSHA general industry standard (Part 1910). The official text below is copied word for word from the Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR). The numbers, injury cases and training on this page show how OSHA enforces it on real job sites.

Official text

(iii) Employers shall include MC in the hazard communication program established to comply with the HCS (§ 1910.1200). Employers shall ensure that each employee has access to labels on containers of MC and to safety data sheets, and is trained in accordance with the requirements of HCS and paragraph (l) of this section. 13 citations

Source: eCFR, text current as of 2026-10-15. Read all of 1910.1052.

See every company cited for this rule.

Export the list: 13 inspections cited 1910.1052(k)(1)(iii) in the last 3 years, with employer, location, penalty and date.

Purple Belt, $59/mo

Where and how often it was cited

YearCitations
20245
20256
20262

Top states: MI (3), PA (3), MD (2), OR (1), NJ (1)

Largest penalties

EmployerLocationPenalty for this rule
FORBO FLOORING INCHAZLETON, PA$8,000
DESIGNER T'SBROOKLAWN, NJ$4,700
317734205 - KG FAB AND MACHINE INCHILLSBORO, OR$300
EVERGLAZE, LLCNOTTINGHAM, MD$0
PUROILS LLCEDMORE, MI$0

Free toolbox talk

A 5-minute crew talk on 1910.1052(k)(1)(iii), plus alerts when this rule changes. Free.




OSHA interpretation letters

None exist. OSHA has not published a letter of interpretation for 1910.1052(k)(1)(iii).

Related parts of this rule

Get your crew competent

Trainers on Black Belt Safety: Marc Harvey

Trainers and suppliers: feature your business on this rule for $25/month.

Frequently asked questions

Must MC be in the hazard communication program?

Yes. Employers shall include MC in the program established under 1910.1200.

What must employees have access to?

Labels on containers of MC and safety data sheets.

What training is required?

Training in accordance with the HCS and paragraph (l) of 1910.1052.

About this page

Sources

3-year window. Federal OSHA only; state-plan rules are not counted. Plain-language text is a summary, not legal advice; the official text controls. Black Belt Safety is not part of OSHA or the Department of Labor.

Written and reviewed by

Black Belt Safety Editorial Team

Site Safety Officer and Safety Professional

OSHA 30 · CPR · USACE CQM

Written and reviewed by the Black Belt Safety team. Every post is checked against the OSHA standard or agency source it cites.

Desplácese hacia arriba