29 CFR 1910 · General Industry

1910.1053(g)(1): When Silica Respirators Are Required

By Black Belt Safety Editorial Team Official text as of octubre 15, 2026 Data updated octubre 23, 2026 3 min read

In plain words:

Where respirators are required for respirable crystalline silica, employers must provide each employee an appropriate respirator meeting this rule and 1910.134. Respirators are required where exposures exceed the PEL while feasible controls are being installed or during tasks where controls are not feasible, when all feasible controls still do not get exposure to or below the PEL, and during periods in a regulated area.

Key takeaways

  • 1910.1053(g)(1) is part of OSHA's general industry standards (29 CFR Part 1910).
  • OSHA cited it 26 times in the last 3 years, in 26 inspections, with $184,208 in current penalties.
  • Most citations: NY (3), TN (3), MI (2).
  • Related part: 1910.1053(g) Respiratory protection (98 citations).
  • Free 5-minute toolbox talk for your crew below.
26citations, 3 years
$184,208current penalties
26inspections
0linked injury cases
In this article
  1. What this rule covers
  2. Official text
  3. Where and how often it was cited
  4. Free toolbox talk
  5. OSHA interpretation letters
  6. Related parts of this rule
  7. Get your crew competent
  8. Frequently asked questions
  9. About this page

What this rule covers

29 CFR 1910.1053(g)(1) ("General") is one requirement inside 1910.1053 Respirable crystalline silica, an OSHA general industry standard (Part 1910). It includes 4 sub-paragraphs. The official text below is copied word for word from the Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR). The numbers, injury cases and training on this page show how OSHA enforces it on real job sites.

Official text

(1) General. Where respiratory protection is required by this section, the employer must provide each employee an appropriate respirator that complies with the requirements of this paragraph and 29 CFR 1910.134. Respiratory protection is required: 26 citations

(i) Where exposures exceed the PEL during periods necessary to install or implement feasible engineering and work practice controls; 6 citations

(ii) Where exposures exceed the PEL during tasks, such as certain maintenance and repair tasks, for which engineering and work practice controls are not feasible;

(iii) During tasks for which an employer has implemented all feasible engineering and work practice controls and such controls are not sufficient to reduce exposures to or below the PEL; and Open (g)(1)(iii) 4 citations

(iv) During periods when the employee is in a regulated area. 4 citations

Source: eCFR, text current as of 2026-10-15. Read all of 1910.1053.

Where and how often it was cited

YearCitations
20231
202412
20259
20264

Top states: NY (3), TN (3), MI (2), MA (2), PA (2)

Largest penalties

EmployerLocationPenalty for this rule
GENERAL SHALE BRICK, INC.WATSONTOWN, PA$165,514
THE LAKEWOOD BRICK AND TILE COMPANYLAKEWOOD, CO$6,000
HILLTOP SLATE, INC.MIDDLE GRANVILLE, NY$4,194
157503 - BUECHEL STONE CORP.MARION, NC$3,250
ROCHESTER FLOORING KITCHEN AND BATHROCHESTER, NY$3,000

Free toolbox talk

A 5-minute crew talk on 1910.1053(g)(1), plus alerts when this rule changes. Free.




OSHA interpretation letters

Related parts of this rule

Get your crew competent

Trainers on Black Belt Safety: Marc Harvey, Dana Reyes

Trainers and suppliers: feature your business on this rule for $25/month.

Frequently asked questions

When must silica respirators be used?

Where exposures exceed the PEL while controls are being installed or during tasks where controls are not feasible, when feasible controls are not enough to reach the PEL, and in a regulated area.

Which respirator rule applies?

29 CFR 1910.134 along with this paragraph.

Who provides the respirator?

The employer must provide each employee an appropriate respirator.

About this page

Sources

3-year window. Federal OSHA only; state-plan rules are not counted. Plain-language text is a summary, not legal advice; the official text controls. Black Belt Safety is not part of OSHA or the Department of Labor.

Written and reviewed by

Black Belt Safety Editorial Team

Site Safety Officer and Safety Professional

OSHA 30 · CPR · USACE CQM

Written and reviewed by the Black Belt Safety team. Every post is checked against the OSHA standard or agency source it cites.

Desplácese hacia arriba