29 CFR 1910 · General Industry · Subpart H

1910.119(e)(3)(vi): Human Factors in Process Hazard Analysis

By Black Belt Safety Editorial Team Official text as of octubre 15, 2026 Data updated octubre 21, 2026 2 min read

In plain words:

The process hazard analysis must address human factors.

Key takeaways

  • 1910.119(e)(3)(vi) is part of OSHA's general industry standards (29 CFR Part 1910, Subpart H).
  • OSHA cited it 15 times in the last 3 years, in 15 inspections, with $138,175 in current penalties.
  • 1 death is linked to inspections that cited this rule.
  • Most citations: OH (2), PA (2), OR (1).
  • Related part: 1910.119(e) Process hazard analysis (165 citations).
  • Free 5-minute toolbox talk for your crew below.
15citations, 3 years
$138,175current penalties
15inspections
1linked deaths
In this article
  1. What this rule covers
  2. Official text
  3. Injuries linked to this rule
  4. Where and how often it was cited
  5. Free toolbox talk
  6. OSHA interpretation letters
  7. Related parts of this rule
  8. Get your crew competent
  9. Frequently asked questions
  10. About this page

What this rule covers

29 CFR 1910.119(e)(3)(vi) is one requirement inside 1910.119 Process safety management of highly hazardous chemicals, an OSHA general industry standard (Part 1910, Subpart H). The official text below is copied word for word from the Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR). The numbers, injury cases and training on this page show how OSHA enforces it on real job sites.

Official text

(vi) Human factors; and 15 citations

Source: eCFR, text current as of 2026-10-15. Read all of 1910.119.

Injuries linked to this rule

1 death is linked to inspections where OSHA cited 1910.119(e)(3)(vi).

One employee is killed and two others are injured in explosi
2024-07-03 · Fatal · HAMPTON, AR

At 8:15 a.m. on July 3, 2024, Employee #1, Employee #2, and Employee #3 were inserting smoke composition material into aluminum pyrotechnic vessels when an explosion occurred. Employee #1 was fatally injured. Employee #2 was hospitalized, and Employee #3 sustained non-hospitalized injuries. The incident involved…

Where and how often it was cited

YearCitations
20232
20242
20257
20264

Top states: OH (2), PA (2), OR (1), KS (1), HI (1)

Largest penalties

EmployerLocationPenalty for this rule
ACCURATE ENERGETIC SYSTEMS, LLCMC EWEN, TN$70,000
FULLER INDUSTRIES, INC.GREAT BEND, KS$16,147
GENERAL DYNAMICS ORDNANCE AND TACTICAL SYSTEMS, INC.HAMPTON, AR$16,131
VANDEMARK CHEMICAL, INC.LOCKPORT, NY$11,250
OLYMPIA FOOD INDUSTRIES INC.FRANKLIN PARK, IL$10,000

Free toolbox talk

A 5-minute crew talk on 1910.119(e)(3)(vi), plus alerts when this rule changes. Free.




OSHA interpretation letters

None exist. OSHA has not published a letter of interpretation for 1910.119(e)(3)(vi).

Related parts of this rule

Get your crew competent

Trainers on Black Belt Safety: Marc Harvey, Dana Reyes

Trainers and suppliers: feature your business on this rule for $25/month.

Frequently asked questions

What must a process hazard analysis address?

Among other items, it must address human factors.

Which standard is this?

1910.119(e)(3)(vi), Process Safety Management of Highly Hazardous Chemicals.

What are human factors?

How people interact with the process, such as the chance of human error.

About this page

Sources

3-year window. Federal OSHA only; state-plan rules are not counted. Plain-language text is a summary, not legal advice; the official text controls. Black Belt Safety is not part of OSHA or the Department of Labor.

Written and reviewed by

Black Belt Safety Editorial Team

Site Safety Officer and Safety Professional

OSHA 30 · CPR · USACE CQM

Written and reviewed by the Black Belt Safety team. Every post is checked against the OSHA standard or agency source it cites.

Desplácese hacia arriba