29 CFR 1910 · General Industry · Subpart J

1910.146(g)(3): Confined Space Training Must Build Proficiency

By Black Belt Safety Editorial Team Official text as of octubre 15, 2026 Data updated octubre 20, 2026 3 min read

In plain words:

Permit-required confined space training must make employees proficient in the duties this section requires, and must introduce new or revised procedures as needed to comply with the section.

Key takeaways

  • 1910.146(g)(3) is part of OSHA's general industry standards (29 CFR Part 1910, Subpart J).
  • OSHA cited it 20 times in the last 3 years, in 17 inspections, with $94,525 in current penalties.
  • 1 death is linked to inspections that cited this rule.
  • Most citations: TN (5), OK (4), MN (4).
  • Related part: 1910.146(g) Training (282 citations).
  • Free 5-minute toolbox talk for your crew below.
20citations, 3 years
$94,525current penalties
17inspections
1linked deaths
In this article
  1. What this rule covers
  2. Official text
  3. Injuries linked to this rule
  4. Where and how often it was cited
  5. Free toolbox talk
  6. OSHA interpretation letters
  7. Related parts of this rule
  8. Get your crew competent
  9. Frequently asked questions
  10. About this page

What this rule covers

29 CFR 1910.146(g)(3) is one requirement inside 1910.146 Permit-required confined spaces, an OSHA general industry standard (Part 1910, Subpart J). The official text below is copied word for word from the Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR). The numbers, injury cases and training on this page show how OSHA enforces it on real job sites.

Official text

(3) The training shall establish employee proficiency in the duties required by this section and shall introduce new or revised procedures, as necessary, for compliance with this section. 20 citations

Source: eCFR, text current as of 2026-10-15. Read all of 1910.146.

Injuries linked to this rule

1 death is linked to inspections where OSHA cited 1910.146(g)(3).

Employee killed in tank due to chemical exposure
2024-03-07 · Fatal · VIRGINIA, MN

On March 7, 2024, following an automatic cleaning process of a tank trailer, theemployee entered the tank, presumably to conduct routine inspection of the tank following the wash process. The employee was wearing rubber gloves, boots, and coveralls and was not wearing a respirator or…

Where and how often it was cited

YearCitations
20231
202411
20254
20264

Top states: TN (5), OK (4), MN (4), AK (2), CT (2)

Largest penalties

EmployerLocationPenalty for this rule
107323 - WAYNE TRANSPORTS INCVIRGINIA, MN$67,200
FUYAO GLASS AMERICA INC.MORAINE, OH$14,188
C & M ROUSTABOUT SERVICES, LLCPURCELL, OK$6,452
ADVANCED UNDERGROUND INSPECTION LLCPONTIAC, MI$2,100
REAL ALLOY RECYCLING, LLCLOUDON, TN$1,750

Free toolbox talk

A 5-minute crew talk on 1910.146(g)(3), plus alerts when this rule changes. Free.




OSHA interpretation letters

None exist. OSHA has not published a letter of interpretation for 1910.146(g)(3).

Related parts of this rule

Get your crew competent

Trainers on Black Belt Safety: Marc Harvey, Dana Reyes

Trainers and suppliers: feature your business on this rule for $25/month.

Frequently asked questions

What must confined space training achieve?

It must establish employee proficiency in the duties required by the section.

Does training cover procedure changes?

Yes. It must introduce new or revised procedures as necessary for compliance.

Is a sign-in sheet enough?

No. The training must establish that employees are proficient.

About this page

Sources

3-year window. Federal OSHA only; state-plan rules are not counted. Plain-language text is a summary, not legal advice; the official text controls. Black Belt Safety is not part of OSHA or the Department of Labor.

Written and reviewed by

Black Belt Safety Editorial Team

Site Safety Officer and Safety Professional

OSHA 30 · CPR · USACE CQM

Written and reviewed by the Black Belt Safety team. Every post is checked against the OSHA standard or agency source it cites.

Desplácese hacia arriba