1926.1153(f)(1): No Dry Sweeping of Silica Dust
Employers must not allow dry sweeping or dry brushing where it could contribute to employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica, unless wet sweeping, HEPA-filtered vacuuming or other methods that minimize exposure are not feasible.
Key takeaways
- 1926.1153(f)(1) is part of OSHA's construction standards (29 CFR Part 1926, Subpart Z).
- OSHA cited it 59 times in the last 3 years, in 59 inspections, with $93,580 in current penalties.
- Most citations: KY (8), VA (7), IL (5).
- Related part: 1926.1153(f) Housekeeping (68 citations).
- Free 5-minute toolbox talk for your crew below.
In this article
What this rule covers
29 CFR 1926.1153(f)(1) is one requirement inside 1926.1153 Respirable crystalline silica, an OSHA construction standard (Part 1926, Subpart Z). The official text below is copied word for word from the Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR). The numbers, injury cases and training on this page show how OSHA enforces it on real job sites.
Official text
(1) The employer shall not allow dry sweeping or dry brushing where such activity could contribute to employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica unless wet sweeping, HEPA-filtered vacuuming or other methods that minimize the likelihood of exposure are not feasible. 59 citations
Source: eCFR, text current as of 2026-10-15. Read all of 1926.1153.
Where and how often it was cited
| Year | Citations |
|---|---|
| 2023 | 1 |
| 2024 | 31 |
| 2025 | 13 |
| 2026 | 14 |
Top states: KY (8), VA (7), IL (5), MD (5), ME (3)
Largest penalties
| Employer | Location | Penalty for this rule |
|---|---|---|
| NATIONAL POOLS OF ROANOKE INC | MASSANUTTEN, VA | $7,690 |
| MCHUGH CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION, INC. | CHICAGO, IL | $6,809 |
| ENVIROVANTAGE INC. | BANGOR, ME | $6,347 |
| 69122 - CITY OF GEORGETOWN | GEORGETOWN, KY | $6,300 |
| NANA'S CONSTRUCTION, INC. | PAGO PAGO, AS | $5,323 |
Free toolbox talk
A 5-minute crew talk on 1926.1153(f)(1), plus alerts when this rule changes. Free.
OSHA interpretation letters
- A leaf blower should not be used to remove silica dust from clothing (2020-08-19)
- Types of construction work excluded from the Silica standard (2019-07-25)
Related parts of this rule
- 1926.1153(f) Housekeeping 68 citations
- 1926.1153(f)(2) 9 citations
Get your crew competent
Trainers on Black Belt Safety: Marc Harvey, Dana Reyes
Trainers and suppliers: feature your business on this rule for $25/month.
Frequently asked questions
Is dry sweeping of silica dust allowed?
Not where it could contribute to exposure, unless wet sweeping, HEPA-filtered vacuuming or other low-exposure methods are not feasible.
What methods should be used instead?
Wet sweeping, HEPA-filtered vacuuming or other methods that minimize the likelihood of exposure.
Does dry brushing count?
Yes. Dry brushing is covered the same as dry sweeping.
About this page
Sources
- 29 CFR 1926.1153 (eCFR), text current as of 2026-10-15
- U.S. Department of Labor enforcement data: OSHA inspections, citations and accident records, copied nightly; data as of 2026-10-20
3-year window. Federal OSHA only; state-plan rules are not counted. Plain-language text is a summary, not legal advice; the official text controls. Black Belt Safety is not part of OSHA or the Department of Labor.