29 CFR 1910 · General Industry

1910.1052(d): Methylene Chloride Exposure Monitoring

By Black Belt Safety Editorial Team Official text as of October 15, 2026 Data updated October 20, 2026 8 min read

In plain words:

Where methylene chloride (MC) is present, employers must determine each employee's exposure by taking personal breathing zone air samples of each employee or samples that are representative. Representative samples must come from the employee in each job classification expected to have the highest MC exposure, and monitoring methods must be accurate to a 95 percent confidence level.

Key takeaways

  • 1910.1052(d) is part of OSHA's general industry standards (29 CFR Part 1910).
  • OSHA cited it 70 times in the last 3 years, in 70 inspections, with $253,899 in current penalties.
  • 1 death is linked to inspections that cited this rule.
  • Most citations: MI (8), TN (8), PA (7).
  • Related part: 1910.1052(d)(2) Initial determination (46 citations).
  • Free 5-minute toolbox talk for your crew below.
70citations, 3 years
$253,899current penalties
70inspections
1linked deaths
In this article
  1. What this rule covers
  2. Official text
  3. Injuries linked to this rule
  4. Where and how often it was cited
  5. Free toolbox talk
  6. OSHA interpretation letters
  7. Related parts of this rule
  8. Get your crew competent
  9. Frequently asked questions
  10. About this page

What this rule covers

29 CFR 1910.1052(d) ("Exposure monitoring") is one requirement inside 1910.1052 Methylene chloride, an OSHA general industry standard (Part 1910). It includes 25 sub-paragraphs. The official text below is copied word for word from the Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR). The numbers, injury cases and training on this page show how OSHA enforces it on real job sites.

Official text

(d) Exposure monitoring — 70 citations

(1) Characterization of employee exposure. Open (d)(1) 21 citations

(i) Where MC is present in the workplace, the employer shall determine each employee's exposure by either: Open (d)(1)(i) 21 citations

(A) Taking a personal breathing zone air sample of each employee's exposure; or 1 citations

(B) Taking personal breathing zone air samples that are representative of each employee's exposure. 1 citations

(ii) Representative samples. The employer may consider personal breathing zone air samples to be representative of employee exposures when they are taken as follows: Open (d)(1)(ii)

(A) 8-hour TWA PEL. The employer has taken one or more personal breathing zone air samples for at least one employee in each job classification in a work area during every work shift, and the employee sampled is expected to have the highest MC exposure.

(B) Short-term exposure limits. The employer has taken one or more personal breathing zone air samples which indicate the highest likely 15-minute exposures during such operations for at least one employee in each job classification in the work area during every work shift, and the employee sampled is expected to have the highest MC exposure.

(C) Exception. Personal breathing zone air samples taken during one work shift may be used to represent employee exposures on other work shifts where the employer can document that the tasks performed and conditions in the workplace are similar across shifts.

(iii) Accuracy of monitoring. The employer shall ensure that the methods used to perform exposure monitoring produce results that are accurate to a confidence level of 95 percent, and are:

(A) Within plus or minus 25 percent for airborne concentrations of MC above the 8-hour TWA PEL or the STEL; or

(B) Within plus or minus 35 percent for airborne concentrations of MC at or above the action level but at or below the 8-hour TWA PEL.

(2) Initial determination. Each employer whose employees are exposed to MC shall perform initial exposure monitoring to determine each affected employee's exposure, except under the following conditions: Open (d)(2) 46 citations

(i) Where objective data demonstrate that MC cannot be released in the workplace in airborne concentrations at or above the action level or above the STEL. The objective data shall represent the highest MC exposures likely to occur under reasonably foreseeable conditions of processing, use, or handling. The employer shall document the objective data exemption as specified in paragraph (m) of this section; 1 citations

(ii) Where the employer has performed exposure monitoring within 12 months prior to April 10, 1997 and that exposure monitoring meets all other requirements of this section, and was conducted under conditions substantially equivalent to existing conditions; or

(iii) Where employees are exposed to MC on fewer than 30 days per year (e.g., on a construction site), and the employer has measurements by direct-reading instruments which give immediate results (such as a detector tube) and which provide sufficient information regarding employee exposures to determine what control measures are necessary to reduce exposures to acceptable levels.

(3) Periodic monitoring. Where the initial determination shows employee exposures at or above the action level or above the STEL, the employer shall establish an exposure monitoring program for periodic monitoring of employee exposure to MC in accordance with Table 1:

Table 1—Initial Determination Exposure Scenarios and Their Associated Monitoring Frequencies

Exposure scenario Required monitoring activity
Below the action level and at or below the STEL No 8-hour TWA or STEL monitoring required.
Below the action level and above the STEL No 8-hour TWA monitoring required; monitor STEL exposures every three months.
At or above the action level, at or below the TWA, and at or below the STEL Monitor 8-hour TWA exposures every six months.
At or above the action level, at or below the TWA, and above the STEL Monitor 8-hour TWA exposures every six months and monitor STEL exposures every three months.
Above the TWA and at or below the STEL Monitor 8-hour TWA exposures every three months. In addition, without regard to the last sentence of the note to paragraph (d)(3), the following employers must monitor STEL exposures every three months until either the date by which they must achieve the 8-hour TWA PEL under paragraph (n) of this section or the date by which they in fact achieve the 8-hour TWA PEL, whichever comes first: employers engaged in polyurethane foam manufacturing; foam fabrication; furniture refinishing; general aviation aircraft stripping; product formulation; use of MC-based adhesives for boat building and repair, recreational vehicle manufacture, van conversion, or upholstery; and use of MC in construction work for restoration and preservation of buildings, painting and paint removal, cabinet making, or floor refinishing and resurfacing.
Above the TWA and above the STEL Monitor 8-hour TWA exposures and STEL exposures every three months.

The employer may decrease the frequency of 8-hour TWA exposure monitoring to every six months when at least two consecutive measurements taken at least seven days apart show exposures to be at or below the 8-hour TWA PEL. The employer may discontinue the periodic 8-hour TWA monitoring for employees where at least two consecutive measurements taken at least seven days apart are below the action level. The employer may discontinue the periodic STEL monitoring for employees where at least two consecutive measurements taken at least 7 days apart are at or below the STEL.

(4) Additional monitoring. 2 citations

(i) The employer shall perform exposure monitoring when a change in workplace conditions indicates that employee exposure may have increased. Examples of situations that may require additional monitoring include changes in production, process, control equipment, or work practices, or a leak, rupture, or other breakdown. 2 citations

(ii) Where exposure monitoring is performed due to a spill, leak, rupture or equipment breakdown, the employer shall clean-up the MC and perform the appropriate repairs before monitoring.

(5) Employee notification of monitoring results. 1 citations

(i) The employer shall, within 15 working days after the receipt of the results of any monitoring performed under this section, notify each affected employee of these results in writing, either individually or by posting of results in an appropriate location that is accessible to affected employees.

(ii) Whenever monitoring results indicate that employee exposure is above the 8-hour TWA PEL or the STEL, the employer shall describe in the written notification the corrective action being taken to reduce employee exposure to or below the 8-hour TWA PEL or STEL and the schedule for completion of this action. 1 citations

(6) Observation of monitoring —

(i) Employee observation. The employer shall provide affected employees or their designated representatives an opportunity to observe any monitoring of employee exposure to MC conducted in accordance with this section.

(ii) Observation procedures. When observation of the monitoring of employee exposure to MC requires entry into an area where the use of protective clothing or equipment is required, the employer shall provide, at no cost to the observer(s), and the observer(s) shall be required to use such clothing and equipment and shall comply with all other applicable safety and health procedures.

Source: eCFR, text current as of 2026-10-15. Read all of 1910.1052.

Injuries linked to this rule

1 death is linked to inspections where OSHA cited 1910.1052(d).

Employee dies after inhaling paint stripper containing methy
2024-10-29 · Fatal · NEW YORK, NY

At 7:10 p.m. on October 29, 2024, an employee was scraping paint from a bathtub using a paint stripper containing 70-90% methylene chloride (Hoodstrip-888 Semi Paste Remover). The employee became unconscious due to inhaling methylene chloride vapors above the short-term exposure limit (STEL) and subsequently…

Where and how often it was cited

YearCitations
20231
202427
202528
202614

Top states: MI (8), TN (8), PA (7), OR (6), WI (6)

Largest penalties

EmployerLocationPenalty for this rule
KAMESI CORPORATIONNEW YORK, NY$107,584
SUNFLOWER MANUFACTURING, LLCHUDSON, CO$11,916
NORTH AMERICAN SPECIALTY LAMINATIONS ? OSSEO LLCOSSEO, WI$9,502
THE SAYLES COMPANY LLCCOLUMBUS, OH$9,268
CHROME HEARTS FACTORY LLCALBUQUERQUE, NM$8,372

Free toolbox talk

A 5-minute crew talk on 1910.1052(d), plus alerts when this rule changes. Free.




OSHA interpretation letters

Related parts of this rule

Get your crew competent

Trainers on Black Belt Safety: Marc Harvey, Dana Reyes

Trainers and suppliers: feature your business on this rule for $25/month.

Frequently asked questions

How must employers measure MC exposure?

By taking personal breathing zone air samples of each employee's exposure, or samples that are representative of each employee's exposure.

Who should be sampled for representative samples?

At least one employee in each job classification in the work area during every work shift who is expected to have the highest MC exposure.

How accurate must monitoring be?

Accurate to a confidence level of 95 percent, within plus or minus 25 percent above the 8-hour TWA PEL or STEL, or plus or minus 35 percent at or above the action level up to the 8-hour TWA PEL.

About this page

Sources

3-year window. Federal OSHA only; state-plan rules are not counted. Plain-language text is a summary, not legal advice; the official text controls. Black Belt Safety is not part of OSHA or the Department of Labor.

Written and reviewed by

Black Belt Safety Editorial Team

Site Safety Officer and Safety Professional

OSHA 30 · CPR · USACE CQM

Written and reviewed by the Black Belt Safety team. Every post is checked against the OSHA standard or agency source it cites.

Scroll to top