1926.1101(f)(3)(i): Daily Monitoring for Class I and II Asbestos Work
Employers must conduct daily monitoring representative of the exposure of each employee assigned to a regulated area doing Class I or II asbestos work, unless the employer has made a negative exposure assessment for the entire operation.
Key takeaways
- 1926.1101(f)(3)(i) is part of OSHA's construction standards (29 CFR Part 1926, Subpart Z).
- OSHA cited it 14 times in the last 3 years, in 14 inspections, with $9,150 in current penalties.
- Most citations: MO (3), TN (2), NC (1).
- Related part: 1926.1101(f) Exposure assessments and monitoring (211 citations).
- Free 5-minute toolbox talk for your crew below.
In this article
What this rule covers
29 CFR 1926.1101(f)(3)(i) ("Class I and II operations") is one requirement inside 1926.1101 Asbestos, an OSHA construction standard (Part 1926, Subpart Z). The official text below is copied word for word from the Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR). The numbers, injury cases and training on this page show how OSHA enforces it on real job sites.
Official text
(i) Class I and II operations. The employer shall conduct daily monitoring that is representative of the exposure of each employee who is assigned to work within a regulated area who is performing Class I or II work, unless the employer pursuant to (f)(2)(iii) of this section, has made a negative exposure assessment for the entire operation. 14 citations
Source: eCFR, text current as of 2026-10-15. Read all of 1926.1101.
Where and how often it was cited
| Year | Citations |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 4 |
| 2025 | 6 |
| 2026 | 4 |
Top states: MO (3), TN (2), NC (1), OR (1), NM (1)
Largest penalties
| Employer | Location | Penalty for this rule |
|---|---|---|
| ASBESTOS EXPERTS, LLC | SANTA FE, NM | $4,462 |
| SUNBELT ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC | MARSHFIELD, MO | $2,009 |
| ATKINS ENTERPRISE, LLC | NASHVILLE, TN | $1,200 |
| 109277 - PREMIERE RESTORATION LLC | MANKATO, MN | $854 |
| 67838 - ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANING SOLUTIONS LLC | HOPKINSVILLE, KY | $625 |
Free toolbox talk
A 5-minute crew talk on 1926.1101(f)(3)(i), plus alerts when this rule changes. Free.
OSHA interpretation letters
None exist. OSHA has not published a letter of interpretation for 1926.1101(f)(3)(i).
Related parts of this rule
- 1926.1101(f) Exposure assessments and monitoring 211 citations
- 1926.1101(f)(1) General monitoring criteria 123 citations
- 1926.1101(f)(1)(i) 101 citations
- 1926.1101(f)(2) Initial Exposure Assessment 66 citations
- 1926.1101(f)(2)(i) 62 citations
- 1926.1101(f)(1)(ii) 18 citations
- 1926.1101(f)(3) Periodic monitoring 14 citations
- 1926.1101(f)(5) Employee notification of monitoring results 5 citations
- 1926.1101(f)(2)(iii) 1 citations
- 1926.1101(f)(2)(iii)(A)
- 1926.1101(f)(6) Observation of monitoring
Get your crew competent
Trainers on Black Belt Safety: Marc Harvey, Dana Reyes
Trainers and suppliers: feature your business on this rule for $25/month.
Frequently asked questions
Who must be monitored daily?
Each employee assigned to work in a regulated area performing Class I or II work.
When is daily monitoring not required?
When the employer has made a negative exposure assessment for the entire operation under (f)(2)(iii).
Must the monitoring be representative?
Yes, of each employee's exposure.
About this page
Sources
- 29 CFR 1926.1101 (eCFR), text current as of 2026-10-15
- U.S. Department of Labor enforcement data: OSHA inspections, citations and accident records, copied nightly; data as of 2026-10-20
3-year window. Federal OSHA only; state-plan rules are not counted. Plain-language text is a summary, not legal advice; the official text controls. Black Belt Safety is not part of OSHA or the Department of Labor.