29 CFR 1926 · Construction · Subpart Z

1926.1153(e)(2): Respiratory Protection Program for Silica

By Black Belt Safety Editorial Team Official text as of October 15, 2026 Data updated October 19, 2026 3 min read

In plain words:

Where this silica standard requires respirator use, employers must set up a respiratory protection program in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.134.

Key takeaways

  • 1926.1153(e)(2) is part of OSHA's construction standards (29 CFR Part 1926, Subpart Z).
  • OSHA cited it 68 times in the last 3 years, in 68 inspections, with $75,276 in current penalties.
  • 1 death is linked to inspections that cited this rule.
  • Most citations: MI (8), PA (6), IL (5).
  • Related part: 1926.1153(e) Respiratory protection (123 citations).
  • Free 5-minute toolbox talk for your crew below.
68citations, 3 years
$75,276current penalties
68inspections
1linked deaths
In this article
  1. What this rule covers
  2. Official text
  3. Injuries linked to this rule
  4. Where and how often it was cited
  5. Free toolbox talk
  6. OSHA interpretation letters
  7. Related parts of this rule
  8. Get your crew competent
  9. Frequently asked questions
  10. About this page

What this rule covers

29 CFR 1926.1153(e)(2) ("Respiratory protection program") is one requirement inside 1926.1153 Respirable crystalline silica, an OSHA construction standard (Part 1926, Subpart Z). The official text below is copied word for word from the Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR). The numbers, injury cases and training on this page show how OSHA enforces it on real job sites.

Official text

(2) Respiratory protection program. Where respirator use is required by this section, the employer shall institute a respiratory protection program in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.134. 68 citations

Source: eCFR, text current as of 2026-10-15. Read all of 1926.1153.

Injuries linked to this rule

1 death is linked to inspections where OSHA cited 1926.1153(e)(2).

Employee collapses due to severe asthma attack and later die
2024-05-07 · Fatal · TIMBER LAKE, SD

At 8:30 a.m. on May 7, 2024, Employee #1 was preparing to sand an epoxy patch when they exited the area, reporting difficulty breathing. The employee collapsed shortly afterward. Despite immediate attention, the employee later died from a severe asthma attack. The cause of the…

Where and how often it was cited

YearCitations
20236
202432
202518
202612

Top states: MI (8), PA (6), IL (5), CT (5), SD (4)

Largest penalties

EmployerLocationPenalty for this rule
TRI-STATE CONSTRUCTION, INC.PHILADELPHIA, PA$16,550
CENTENNIAL CONCRETE & WATERPROOFING LLCGREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO$5,000
PERFORMANCE PERSONNEL SERVICES OF PENSACOLA, LLCMOBILE, AL$4,766
TOTAL DEMOLITION SERVICES LLCENID, OK$3,500
BAILEY PHOENIX INC.PHILADELPHIA, PA$3,476

Free toolbox talk

A 5-minute crew talk on 1926.1153(e)(2), plus alerts when this rule changes. Free.




OSHA interpretation letters

Related parts of this rule

Get your crew competent

Trainers on Black Belt Safety: Marc Harvey, Dana Reyes

Trainers and suppliers: feature your business on this rule for $25/month.

Frequently asked questions

When is a respiratory protection program required under the silica rule?

Where respirator use is required by 1926.1153.

What standard must the program follow?

29 CFR 1910.134.

Who must set up the program?

The employer.

About this page

Sources

3-year window. Federal OSHA only; state-plan rules are not counted. Plain-language text is a summary, not legal advice; the official text controls. Black Belt Safety is not part of OSHA or the Department of Labor.

Written and reviewed by

Black Belt Safety Editorial Team

Site Safety Officer and Safety Professional

OSHA 30 · CPR · USACE CQM

Written and reviewed by the Black Belt Safety team. Every post is checked against the OSHA standard or agency source it cites.

Scroll to top