29 CFR 1926 · Construction · Subpart AA

1926.1204(e)(1): Testing Permit Space Conditions

By Black Belt Safety Editorial Team Official text as of October 15, 2026 Data updated October 19, 2026 3 min read

In plain words:

Employers must test conditions in a permit space before changing its natural ventilation and before entry begins. If isolating the space is infeasible because it is large or part of a continuous system like a sewer, they must test as far as feasible, continuously monitor where entrants work, and provide an early-warning system for non-isolated engulfment hazards.

Key takeaways

  • 1926.1204(e)(1) is part of OSHA's construction standards (29 CFR Part 1926, Subpart AA).
  • OSHA cited it 11 times in the last 3 years, in 10 inspections, with $48,491 in current penalties.
  • Most citations: TX (2), AL (2), GA (1).
  • Related part: 1926.1204(e) (21 citations).
  • Free 5-minute toolbox talk for your crew below.
11citations, 3 years
$48,491current penalties
10inspections
0linked injury cases
In this article
  1. What this rule covers
  2. Official text
  3. Where and how often it was cited
  4. Free toolbox talk
  5. OSHA interpretation letters
  6. Related parts of this rule
  7. Get your crew competent
  8. Frequently asked questions
  9. About this page

What this rule covers

29 CFR 1926.1204(e)(1) is one requirement inside 1926.1204 Permit-required confined space program, an OSHA construction standard (Part 1926, Subpart AA). It includes 3 sub-paragraphs. The official text below is copied word for word from the Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR). The numbers, injury cases and training on this page show how OSHA enforces it on real job sites.

Official text

(1) Test conditions in the permit space to determine if acceptable entry conditions exist before changes to the space's natural ventilation are made, and before entry is authorized to begin, except that, if an employer demonstrates that isolation of the space is infeasible because the space is large or is part of a continuous system (such as a sewer), the employer must: 11 citations

(i) Perform pre-entry testing to the extent feasible before entry is authorized; and, 4 citations

(ii) If entry is authorized, continuously monitor entry conditions in the areas where authorized entrants are working, except that employers may use periodic monitoring in accordance with paragraph (e)(2) of this section for monitoring an atmospheric hazard if they can demonstrate that equipment for continuously monitoring that hazard is not commercially available; 3 citations

(iii) Provide an early-warning system that continuously monitors for non-isolated engulfment hazards. The system must alert authorized entrants and attendants in sufficient time for the authorized entrants to safely exit the space.

Source: eCFR, text current as of 2026-10-15. Read all of 1926.1204.

Where and how often it was cited

YearCitations
20243
20253
20265

Top states: TX (2), AL (2), GA (1), NJ (1), UT (1)

Largest penalties

EmployerLocationPenalty for this rule
CONSTRUCTION LABOR SERVICES, INC.MOBILE, AL$16,550
D L BANDY CONSTRUCTORS INC.CONVERSE, TX$11,585
W.J. HARRINGTON & SONS CONSTRUCTION CO. INC.WEST WINDSOR, NJ$5,040
159250 - WYNN SITE DEVELOPMENT, INC.COATS, NC$5,000
I.K. STOLTZFUS SERVICE CORP.QUARRYVILLE, PA$4,000

Free toolbox talk

A 5-minute crew talk on 1926.1204(e)(1), plus alerts when this rule changes. Free.




OSHA interpretation letters

None exist. OSHA has not published a letter of interpretation for 1926.1204(e)(1).

Related parts of this rule

Get your crew competent

Trainers on Black Belt Safety: Marc Harvey, Dana Reyes

Trainers and suppliers: feature your business on this rule for $25/month.

Frequently asked questions

When must the space be tested?

Before changes to the space's natural ventilation are made and before entry is authorized.

What if the space cannot be isolated?

Do pre-entry testing as far as feasible, continuously monitor where entrants work, and provide an early-warning system for engulfment hazards.

When can periodic monitoring replace continuous monitoring?

When the employer can show continuous monitoring equipment for that hazard is not commercially available.

About this page

Sources

3-year window. Federal OSHA only; state-plan rules are not counted. Plain-language text is a summary, not legal advice; the official text controls. Black Belt Safety is not part of OSHA or the Department of Labor.

Written and reviewed by

Black Belt Safety Editorial Team

Site Safety Officer and Safety Professional

OSHA 30 · CPR · USACE CQM

Written and reviewed by the Black Belt Safety team. Every post is checked against the OSHA standard or agency source it cites.

Scroll to top