29 CFR 1910 · General Industry · Subpart H

1910.119(e)(3)(v): PHA: Facility Siting

By Black Belt Safety Editorial Team Official text as of October 15, 2026 Data updated October 21, 2026 2 min read

In plain words:

Employers must make sure the process hazard analysis addresses facility siting.

Key takeaways

  • 1910.119(e)(3)(v) is part of OSHA's general industry standards (29 CFR Part 1910, Subpart H).
  • OSHA cited it 10 times in the last 3 years, in 10 inspections, with $118,518 in current penalties.
  • Most citations: TX (2), WI (2), NJ (1).
  • Related part: 1910.119(e) Process hazard analysis (165 citations).
  • Free 5-minute toolbox talk for your crew below.
10citations, 3 years
$118,518current penalties
10inspections
0linked injury cases
In this article
  1. What this rule covers
  2. Official text
  3. Where and how often it was cited
  4. Free toolbox talk
  5. OSHA interpretation letters
  6. Related parts of this rule
  7. Get your crew competent
  8. Frequently asked questions
  9. About this page

What this rule covers

29 CFR 1910.119(e)(3)(v) is one requirement inside 1910.119 Process safety management of highly hazardous chemicals, an OSHA general industry standard (Part 1910, Subpart H). The official text below is copied word for word from the Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR). The numbers, injury cases and training on this page show how OSHA enforces it on real job sites.

Official text

(v) Facility siting; 10 citations

Source: eCFR, text current as of 2026-10-15. Read all of 1910.119.

Where and how often it was cited

YearCitations
20231
20244
20252
20263

Top states: TX (2), WI (2), NJ (1), OR (1), OK (1)

Largest penalties

EmployerLocationPenalty for this rule
ACCURATE ENERGETIC SYSTEMS, LLCMC EWEN, TN$70,000
TROY CHEMICAL CORPORATIONNEWARK, NJ$14,650
THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANYGARLAND, TX$9,679
CENTRAHOMA PROCESSING LLCCOALGATE, OK$9,000
OCEAN SPRAY CRANBERRIES, INC.KENOSHA, WI$8,275

Free toolbox talk

A 5-minute crew talk on 1910.119(e)(3)(v), plus alerts when this rule changes. Free.




OSHA interpretation letters

None exist. OSHA has not published a letter of interpretation for 1910.119(e)(3)(v).

Related parts of this rule

Get your crew competent

Trainers on Black Belt Safety: Marc Harvey, Dana Reyes

Trainers and suppliers: feature your business on this rule for $25/month.

Frequently asked questions

What must the PHA address?

Facility siting.

Is this part of process safety management?

Yes. It is one of the items the process hazard analysis must address.

Who is responsible?

The employer.

About this page

Sources

3-year window. Federal OSHA only; state-plan rules are not counted. Plain-language text is a summary, not legal advice; the official text controls. Black Belt Safety is not part of OSHA or the Department of Labor.

Written and reviewed by

Black Belt Safety Editorial Team

Site Safety Officer and Safety Professional

OSHA 30 · CPR · USACE CQM

Written and reviewed by the Black Belt Safety team. Every post is checked against the OSHA standard or agency source it cites.

Scroll to top