1910.333(b)(2): Lockout and Tagging of Deenergized Electrical Parts
While any employee is exposed to contact with deenergized parts of fixed electric equipment or circuits, employers must lock out, tag out or both the circuits that energize them, following the steps in order. They must keep written procedures available, plan safe deenergizing first, disconnect all energy sources, and not rely on push buttons, selector switches or interlocks as the only means of deenergizing.
Key takeaways
- 1910.333(b)(2) is part of OSHA's general industry standards (29 CFR Part 1910, Subpart S).
- OSHA cited it 223 times in the last 3 years, in 176 inspections, with $722,935 in current penalties.
- 7 deaths are linked to inspections that cited this rule.
- Most citations: VA (25), MI (17), TX (15).
- Related part: 1910.333(b) Working on or near exposed deenergized parts (225 citations).
- Free 5-minute toolbox talk for your crew below.
In this article
What this rule covers
29 CFR 1910.333(b)(2) ("Lockout and tagging") is one requirement inside 1910.333 Selection and use of work practices, an OSHA general industry standard (Part 1910, Subpart S). It includes 20 sub-paragraphs. The official text below is copied word for word from the Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR). The numbers, injury cases and training on this page show how OSHA enforces it on real job sites.
Official text
(2) Lockout and tagging. While any employee is exposed to contact with parts of fixed electric equipment or circuits which have been deenergized, the circuits energizing the parts shall be locked out or tagged or both in accordance with the requirements of this paragraph. The requirements shall be followed in the order in which they are presented (i.e., paragraph (b)(2)(i) first, then paragraph (b)(2)(ii), etc.). 223 citations
As used in this section, fixed equipment refers to equipment fastened in place or connected by permanent wiring methods.
Lockout and tagging procedures that comply with paragraphs (c) through (f) of § 1910.147 will also be deemed to comply with paragraph (b)(2) of this section provided that:
(1) The procedures address the electrical safety hazards covered by this Subpart; and
(2) The procedures also incorporate the requirements of paragraphs (b)(2)(iii)(D) and (b)(2)(iv)(B) of this section.
(i) Procedures. The employer shall maintain a written copy of the procedures outlined in paragraph (b)(2) and shall make it available for inspection by employees and by the Assistant Secretary of Labor and his or her authorized representatives. Open (b)(2)(i) 61 citations
The written procedures may be in the form of a copy of paragraph (b) of this section.
(ii) Deenergizing equipment. Open (b)(2)(ii) 31 citations
(A) Safe procedures for deenergizing circuits and equipment shall be determined before circuits or equipment are deenergized. Open (b)(2)(ii)(a) 18 citations
(B) The circuits and equipment to be worked on shall be disconnected from all electric energy sources. Control circuit devices, such as push buttons, selector switches, and interlocks, may not be used as the sole means for deenergizing circuits or equipment. Interlocks for electric equipment may not be used as a substitute for lockout and tagging procedures. Open (b)(2)(ii)(b) 12 citations
(C) Stored electric energy which might endanger personnel shall be released. Capacitors shall be discharged and high capacitance elements shall be short-circuited and grounded, if the stored electric energy might endanger personnel.
If the capacitors or associated equipment are handled in meeting this requirement, they shall be treated as energized.
(D) Stored non-electrical energy in devices that could reenergize electric circuit parts shall be blocked or relieved to the extent that the circuit parts could not be accidentally energized by the device. Open (b)(2)(ii)(d) 1 citations
(iii) Application of locks and tags. Open (b)(2)(iii) 20 citations
(A) A lock and a tag shall be placed on each disconnecting means used to deenergize circuits and equipment on which work is to be performed, except as provided in paragraphs (b)(2)(iii)(C) and (b)(2)(iii)(E) of this section. The lock shall be attached so as to prevent persons from operating the disconnecting means unless they resort to undue force or the use of tools. Open (b)(2)(iii)(a) 18 citations
(B) Each tag shall contain a statement prohibiting unauthorized operation of the disconnecting means and removal of the tag. Open (b)(2)(iii)(b) 1 citations
(C) If a lock cannot be applied, or if the employer can demonstrate that tagging procedures will provide a level of safety equivalent to that obtained by the use of a lock, a tag may be used without a lock. 1 citations
(D) A tag used without a lock, as permitted by paragraph (b)(2)(iii)(C) of this section, shall be supplemented by at least one additional safety measure that provides a level of safety equivalent to that obtained by the use of a lock. Examples of additional safety measures include the removal of an isolating circuit element, blocking of a controlling switch, or opening of an extra disconnecting device. Open (b)(2)(iii)(d)
(E) A lock may be placed without a tag only under the following conditions: Open (b)(2)(iii)(e)
(1) Only one circuit or piece of equipment is deenergized, and
(2) The lockout period does not extend beyond the work shift, and
(3) Employees exposed to the hazards associated with reenergizing the circuit or equipment are familiar with this procedure.
(iv) Verification of deenergized condition. The requirements of this paragraph shall be met before any circuits or equipment can be considered and worked as deenergized. Open (b)(2)(iv) 31 citations
(A) A qualified person shall operate the equipment operating controls or otherwise verify that the equipment cannot be restarted. Open (b)(2)(iv)(a) 2 citations
(B) A qualified person shall use test equipment to test the circuit elements and electrical parts of equipment to which employees will be exposed and shall verify that the circuit elements and equipment parts are deenergized. The test shall also determine if any energized condition exists as a result of inadvertently induced voltage or unrelated voltage backfeed even though specific parts of the circuit have been deenergized and presumed to be safe. If the circuit to be tested is over 600 volts, nominal, the test equipment shall be checked for proper operation immediately before and immediately after this test. Open (b)(2)(iv)(b) 24 citations
(v) Reenergizing equipment. These requirements shall be met, in the order given, before circuits or equipment are reenergized, even temporarily. Open (b)(2)(v) 4 citations
(A) A qualified person shall conduct tests and visual inspections, as necessary, to verify that all tools, electrical jumpers, shorts, grounds, and other such devices have been removed, so that the circuits and equipment can be safely energized. 2 citations
(B) Employees exposed to the hazards associated with reenergizing the circuit or equipment shall be warned to stay clear of circuits and equipment. 1 citations
(C) Each lock and tag shall be removed by the employee who applied it or under his or her direct supervision. However, if this employee is absent from the workplace, then the lock or tag may be removed by a qualified person designated to perform this task provided that: Open (b)(2)(v)(c)
(1) The employer ensures that the employee who applied the lock or tag is not available at the workplace, and
(2) The employer ensures that the employee is aware that the lock or tag has been removed before he or she resumes work at that workplace.
(D) There shall be a visual determination that all employees are clear of the circuits and equipment.
Source: eCFR, text current as of 2026-10-15. Read all of 1910.333.
Injuries linked to this rule
7 deaths are linked to inspections where OSHA cited 1910.333(b)(2).
At approximately 4:20 a.m. on February 25, 2025, Employee #1 was working on an AirTrain switch electrical panel, attempting to replace blown fuses. During the task, the employee came into contact with energized components and received a 600-volt electric shock. Employee #1 was fatally electrocuted.
Full case list with employer, penalty, filters and download is part of OSHA Data (Purple Belt).
Unlock with Purple BeltWhere and how often it was cited
| Year | Citations |
|---|---|
| 2023 | 10 |
| 2024 | 78 |
| 2025 | 82 |
| 2026 | 53 |
Top states: VA (25), MI (17), TX (15), CT (14), OK (11)
Largest penalties
| Employer | Location | Penalty for this rule |
|---|---|---|
| MILLISON CASTING TECHNOLOGY, LLC | SALLISAW, OK | $33,100 |
| SOUTHERN TECHNICAL INSTITUTE, LLC | TAMPA, FL | $23,646 |
| CHIEF FABRICATION | GRAND ISLAND, NE | $20,326 |
| GEO PREP MID-CITY, INC. | BATON ROUGE, LA | $20,000 |
| HIRSCH ELECTRIC LLC | FAIRFAX, VA | $18,299 |
Free toolbox talk
A 5-minute crew talk on 1910.333(b)(2), plus alerts when this rule changes. Free.
OSHA interpretation letters
- Clarification Regarding the Requirements of OSHA's Selection and Use of Work Practices Standard for Electrical Work (2026-08-17)
- Clarification Regarding the Requirements of 29 CFR 1910.147 (2025-11-24)
- Whether an LED type device ca be used for the isolation and deenergization verification requirements of 1910.147 and 1910.333. (2012-12-12)
- OSHA requirements for warning signs and protection from electric-arc-flash hazards and compliance with NFPA 70E-2004. (2006-11-14)
- Clarification about 29 CFR 1910.333 and 29 CFR 1910.147 as they relate to work inside an electrical panel and on related equipment. (2006-07-28)
- Acceptability of using a light switch as a disconnecting means for the electrical lockout/tagout standard. (2005-10-27)
- Evaluation of proposed modifications to the Bureau of Prisons' Lockout/Tagout (LOTO) procedures. (2000-07-10)
- Verification procedures for group lockout/tagout. (1999-11-16)
- Lockout/tagout procedures, including work permits and groups of machines/equipment. (1994-08-12)
- Control of Hazardous Energy Sources (Group Lockout/Tagout). (1991-01-29)
Related parts of this rule
- 1910.333(b) Working on or near exposed deenergized parts 225 citations
- 1910.333(b)(2)(i) Procedures 61 citations
- 1910.333(b)(2)(iv) 31 citations
- 1910.333(b)(2)(ii) Deenergizing equipment 31 citations
- 1910.333(b)(2)(iv)(B) 24 citations
- 1910.333(b)(2)(iii) Application of locks and tags 20 citations
- 1910.333(b)(2)(iii)(A) 18 citations
- 1910.333(b)(2)(ii)(A) 18 citations
- 1910.333(b)(2)(ii)(B) 12 citations
- 1910.333(b)(2)(v) Reenergizing equipment 4 citations
- 1910.333(b)(1) Application 2 citations
- 1910.333(b)(2)(iv)(A) 2 citations
Get your crew competent
Trainers on Black Belt Safety: Marc Harvey, Dana Reyes
Trainers and suppliers: feature your business on this rule for $25/month.
Frequently asked questions
Can I use a push button to shut off equipment I am working on?
Not as the sole means. Control circuit devices may not be used as the sole means for deenergizing circuits or equipment.
Can interlocks replace lockout?
No. Interlocks for electric equipment may not be used as a substitute for lockout and tagging procedures.
When must safe deenergizing procedures be determined?
Before circuits or equipment are deenergized.
About this page
Sources
- 29 CFR 1910.333 (eCFR), text current as of 2026-10-15
- U.S. Department of Labor enforcement data: OSHA inspections, citations and accident records, copied nightly; data as of 2026-10-20
3-year window. Federal OSHA only; state-plan rules are not counted. Plain-language text is a summary, not legal advice; the official text controls. Black Belt Safety is not part of OSHA or the Department of Labor.
