1926.501(b)(2): Leading Edges
Workers building a leading edge 6 feet or more above lower levels need guardrails, safety nets or personal fall arrest, unless the employer proves these are infeasible and uses a fall protection plan. Workers nearby who are not doing the leading edge work also need protection; a control line can stand in for a guardrail along the edge parallel to the leading edge.
Official text: 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(2)
(2) Leading edges.
117 citations(i) Each employee who is constructing a leading edge 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of § 1926.502.
There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with § 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.
Open (b)(2)(i) 80 citations(ii) Each employee on a walking/working surface 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level where leading edges are under construction, but who is not engaged in the leading edge work, shall be protected from falling by a guardrail system, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system. If a guardrail system is chosen to provide the fall protection, and a controlled access zone has already been established for leading edge work, the control line may be used in lieu of a guardrail along the edge that parallels the leading edge.
Open (b)(2)(ii) 33 citationsSource: eCFR, text current as of 2026-10-15. Read all of 1926.501.
Free toolbox talk for this rule
A 5-minute crew talk on 1926.501(b)(2), plus alerts when this rule changes. Free.
Injuries linked to this rule
1 injury case in the last 3 years came from inspections where OSHA cited 1926.501(b)(2), including 1 death.
At 9:30 a.m. on February 12, 2025, Employee #1 and Employee #2 were working as electrical installers for a building equipment contractor installing solar panels on a commercial building roof. Employee #1 was walking on the roof when he stepped on a skylight and fell…
Where and how often it was cited
| Year | Citations |
|---|---|
| 2023 | 9 |
| 2024 | 49 |
| 2025 | 36 |
| 2026 | 23 |
Top states: TX (12), NY (7), VA (6), MS (6), LA (6)
Largest penalties
| Employer | Location | Penalty for this rule |
|---|---|---|
| XE AVILA CONSTRUCTION LLC | LONG BEACH, MS | $27,308 |
| POLLARD CONSTRUCTION | JUNEAU, AK | $26,616 |
| PATRICK CONSTRUCTION INC | HAYSI, VA | $16,287 |
| JOSE M. AGUILERA | PORTER, TX | $12,776 |
| MARTIN BUILDERS ENTERPRISE, LLC | PHOENIX, NY | $11,916 |
OSHA interpretation letters
- Clarification on controlled access zones for leading edge work. (2010-04-30)
- Use of a warning line instead of conventional fall protection; Part 1926 Subpart M (2005-01-03)
- Clarification on several issues regarding OSHA's construction industry standards for fall protection (2003-12-18)
- Fall protection requirements for construction workers doing work while on a roof (2003-12-15)
- Compliance of using warning lines and/or control access zones for fall protection on roofs with a slope greater than 4:12. (2003-09-26)
- Requirements for fall protection when ladder jack scaffolds are used for residential and commercial construction (2003-07-07)
- Fall protection requirements for employees, other than roofers, working on low-slope roofs (2002-11-15)
- Clarification concerning fall protection and vertical walled trenches with depth of 6 feet or greater and use of controlled access zones. (2002-06-24)
- Employees engaged in formwork over 6 feet high must have fall protection. (2000-08-28)
- Acceptable use of warning lines as fall protection for roofers and other trades. (2000-08-01)
- Fall protection non-conforming guardrail criteria for application of a de minimis policy. (2000-05-12)
Related parts of this rule
- 1926.501(b) 23,489 citations
- 1926.501(b)(13) Residential construction 15,470 citations
- 1926.501(b)(1) Unprotected sides and edges 2,860 citations
- 1926.501(b)(10) Roofing work on Low-slope roofs 1,827 citations
- 1926.501(b)(11) Steep roofs 1,554 citations
- 1926.501(b)(4) Holes 1,119 citations
- 1926.501(b)(4)(ii) 670 citations
- 1926.501(b)(4)(i) 423 citations
- 1926.501(b)(14) Wall openings 271 citations
- 1926.501(b)(15) Walking/working surfaces not otherwise addressed 148 citations
- 1926.501(b)(2)(i) 80 citations
- 1926.501(b)(3) Hoist areas 47 citations
Get your crew competent
Trainers on Black Belt Safety: Marc Harvey, Dana Reyes
Trainers and suppliers: feature your business on this rule for $25/month.
About this page
Official text from the eCFR. Citation and injury numbers from public U.S. Department of Labor enforcement and accident records, copied nightly; 3-year window; data as of 2026-10-18. Federal OSHA only; state-plan rules are not counted. Plain-language text is a summary, not legal advice; the official text controls. Black Belt Safety is not part of OSHA or the Department of Labor.
