1926.57(f)(5): Personal protective equipment
Key takeaways
- 1926.57(f)(5) is part of OSHA's construction standards (29 CFR Part 1926, Subpart D).
- OSHA cited it 4 times in the last 3 years, in 4 inspections, with $11,980 in current penalties.
- Related part: 1926.57(f) Abrasive blasting (7 citations).
- Free 5-minute toolbox talk for your crew below.
Get the free 5-minute toolbox talk on 1926.57(f)(5) ↓
In this article
What this rule covers
29 CFR 1926.57(f)(5) ("Personal protective equipment") is one requirement inside 1926.57 Ventilation, an OSHA construction standard (Part 1926, Subpart D). It includes 10 sub-paragraphs. The official text below is copied word for word from the Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR). The numbers, injury cases and training on this page show how OSHA enforces it on real job sites.
Official text
(5) Personal protective equipment. 4 citations
(i) Employers must use only respirators approved by NIOSH under 42 CFR part 84 for protecting employees from dusts produced during abrasive-blasting operations. Open (f)(5)(i) 1 citations
(ii) Abrasive-blasting respirators shall be worn by all abrasive-blasting operators: 3 citations
(A) When working inside of blast-cleaning rooms, or
(B) When using silica sand in manual blasting operations where the nozzle and blast are not physically separated from the operator in an exhaust ventilated enclosure, or
(C) Where concentrations of toxic dust dispersed by the abrasive blasting may exceed the limits set in § 1926.55 or other pertinent sections of this part and the nozzle and blast are not physically separated from the operator in an exhaust-ventilated enclosure.
(iii) Properly fitted particulate-filter respirators, commonly referred to as dust-filter respirators, may be used for short, intermittent, or occasional dust exposures such as cleanup, dumping of dust collectors, or unloading shipments of sand at a receiving point when it is not feasible to control the dust by enclosure, exhaust ventilation, or other means. The respirators used must be approved by NIOSH under 42 CFR part 84 for protection against the specific type of dust encountered.
(iv) A respiratory protection program as defined and described in § 1926.103, shall be established wherever it is necessary to use respiratory protective equipment.
(v) Operators shall be equipped with heavy canvas or leather gloves and aprons or equivalent protection to protect them from the impact of abrasives. Safety shoes shall be worn to protect against foot injury where heavy pieces of work are handled.
(A) Safety shoes shall conform to the requirements of American National Standard for Men's Safety-Toe Footwear, Z41.1-1967.
(B) Equipment for protection of the eyes and face shall be supplied to the operator when the respirator design does not provide such protection and to any other personnel working in the vicinity of abrasive blasting operations. This equipment shall conform to the requirements of § 1926.102.
Source: eCFR, text current as of 2026-10-15. Read all of 1926.57.
Export the list: 4 inspections cited 1926.57(f)(5) in the last 3 years, with employer, location, penalty and date.
Purple Belt, $59/moWhere and how often it was cited
Free toolbox talk
A 5-minute crew talk on 1926.57(f)(5), plus alerts when this rule changes. Free.
OSHA interpretation letters
None exist. OSHA has not published a letter of interpretation for 1926.57(f)(5).
Related parts of this rule
- 1926.57(f) Abrasive blasting 7 citations
- 1926.57(f)(2) Dust hazards from abrasive blasting 1 citations
- 1926.57(f)(5)(i) 1 citations
- 1926.57(f)(1) Definitions applicable to this paragraph
- 1926.57(f)(1)(ii) Abrasive-blasting respirator
Get your crew competent
Trainers on Black Belt Safety: Marc Harvey
Trainers and suppliers: feature your business on this rule for $25/month.
About this page
Sources
- 29 CFR 1926.57 (eCFR), text current as of 2026-10-15
- U.S. Department of Labor enforcement data: OSHA inspections, citations and accident records, copied nightly; data as of 2026-11-07
3-year window. Federal OSHA only; state-plan rules are not counted. Plain-language text is a summary, not legal advice; the official text controls. Black Belt Safety is not part of OSHA or the Department of Labor.
