29 CFR 1926 · Construction · Subpart Z

1926.1153(d)(2)(i): Assessing Silica Exposure in Construction

By Black Belt Safety Editorial Team Official text as of octubre 15, 2026 Data updated octubre 20, 2026 3 min read

In plain words:

Construction employers must assess the exposure of each worker who is or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level. They must use either the performance option or the scheduled monitoring option described in the standard.

Key takeaways

  • 1926.1153(d)(2)(i) is part of OSHA's construction standards (29 CFR Part 1926, Subpart Z).
  • OSHA cited it 623 times in the last 3 years, in 623 inspections, with $349,816 in current penalties.
  • 3 deaths are linked to inspections that cited this rule.
  • Most citations: MI (114), IL (93), GA (69).
  • Related part: 1926.1153(d) Alternative exposure control methods (694 citations).
  • Free 5-minute toolbox talk for your crew below.
623citations, 3 years
$349,816current penalties
623inspections
3linked deaths
In this article
  1. What this rule covers
  2. Official text
  3. Injuries linked to this rule
  4. Where and how often it was cited
  5. Free toolbox talk
  6. OSHA interpretation letters
  7. Related parts of this rule
  8. Get your crew competent
  9. Frequently asked questions
  10. About this page

What this rule covers

29 CFR 1926.1153(d)(2)(i) ("General") is one requirement inside 1926.1153 Respirable crystalline silica, an OSHA construction standard (Part 1926, Subpart Z). The official text below is copied word for word from the Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR). The numbers, injury cases and training on this page show how OSHA enforces it on real job sites.

Official text

(i) General. The employer shall assess the exposure of each employee who is or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of this section. 623 citations

Source: eCFR, text current as of 2026-10-15. Read all of 1926.1153.

Injuries linked to this rule

3 deaths are linked to inspections where OSHA cited 1926.1153(d)(2)(i).

Employee is struck by demo-saw blade and later dies
2024-11-01 · Fatal · AUBURN, NY

At 11:50 a.m. on November 1, 2024, Employee #1 was using a demo-saw to fit two sections of granite curbstone. The saw kicked back, causing the employee to losehis grip on the trigger with his right hand while the saw continued rotating in his left…

See all 3 cases

Full case list with employer, penalty, filters and download is part of OSHA Data (Purple Belt).

Unlock with Purple Belt

Where and how often it was cited

YearCitations
202345
2024210
2025227
2026141

Top states: MI (114), IL (93), GA (69), TX (58), KY (28)

Largest penalties

EmployerLocationPenalty for this rule
SUMMIT POLYMERS INCPORTAGE, MI$27,500
RESTORATION EAST, LLCBETHESDA, MD$26,250
CENTENNIAL CONCRETE & WATERPROOFING LLCLITTLETON, CO$19,359
RA MILLER CONSTRUCTION CO INCHAMILTON, OH$11,585
EMANUEL ENTERPRISES LLCFRIENDSWOOD, TX$11,162

Free toolbox talk

A 5-minute crew talk on 1926.1153(d)(2)(i), plus alerts when this rule changes. Free.




OSHA interpretation letters

None exist. OSHA has not published a letter of interpretation for 1926.1153(d)(2)(i).

Related parts of this rule

Get your crew competent

Trainers on Black Belt Safety: Marc Harvey, Dana Reyes

Trainers and suppliers: feature your business on this rule for $25/month.

Frequently asked questions

Who must have their silica exposure assessed?

Each employee who is or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level.

What methods can the employer use?

Either the performance option or the scheduled monitoring option in the standard.

Does every worker need an assessment?

Only those who are or may reasonably be expected to be exposed at or above the action level.

About this page

Sources

3-year window. Federal OSHA only; state-plan rules are not counted. Plain-language text is a summary, not legal advice; the official text controls. Black Belt Safety is not part of OSHA or the Department of Labor.

Written and reviewed by

Black Belt Safety Editorial Team

Site Safety Officer and Safety Professional

OSHA 30 · CPR · USACE CQM

Written and reviewed by the Black Belt Safety team. Every post is checked against the OSHA standard or agency source it cites.

Desplácese hacia arriba