29 CFR 1926 · Construction · Subpart Z

1926.1153(d): Silica Exposure Limit and Assessment

By Black Belt Safety Editorial Team Official text as of octubre 15, 2026 Data updated octubre 20, 2026 7 min read

In plain words:

Employers who do not fully follow Table 1 controls, or whose tasks are not listed in Table 1, must keep each worker's respirable crystalline silica exposure at or below 50 micrograms per cubic meter averaged over 8 hours. They must assess exposures for workers at or above the action level using air monitoring or objective data, or scheduled monitoring, and repeat monitoring on set timelines.

Key takeaways

  • 1926.1153(d) is part of OSHA's construction standards (29 CFR Part 1926, Subpart Z).
  • OSHA cited it 694 times in the last 3 years, in 666 inspections, with $447,822 in current penalties.
  • 3 deaths are linked to inspections that cited this rule.
  • Most citations: MI (116), IL (102), GA (69).
  • Related part: 1926.1153(d)(2) Exposure assessment (645 citations).
  • Free 5-minute toolbox talk for your crew below.
694citations, 3 years
$447,822current penalties
666inspections
3linked deaths
In this article
  1. What this rule covers
  2. Official text
  3. Injuries linked to this rule
  4. Where and how often it was cited
  5. Free toolbox talk
  6. OSHA interpretation letters
  7. Related parts of this rule
  8. Get your crew competent
  9. Frequently asked questions
  10. About this page

What this rule covers

29 CFR 1926.1153(d) ("Alternative exposure control methods") is one requirement inside 1926.1153 Respirable crystalline silica, an OSHA construction standard (Part 1926, Subpart Z). It includes 21 sub-paragraphs. The official text below is copied word for word from the Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR). The numbers, injury cases and training on this page show how OSHA enforces it on real job sites.

Official text

(d) Alternative exposure control methods. For tasks not listed in Table 1, or where the employer does not fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection described in Table 1: 694 citations

(1) Permissible exposure limit (PEL). The employer shall ensure that no employee is exposed to an airborne concentration of respirable crystalline silica in excess of 50 µg/m3, calculated as an 8-hour TWA. Open (d)(1) 35 citations

(2) Exposure assessment — Open (d)(2) 645 citations

(i) General. The employer shall assess the exposure of each employee who is or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of this section. Open (d)(2)(i) 623 citations

(ii) Performance option. The employer shall assess the 8-hour TWA exposure for each employee on the basis of any combination of air monitoring data or objective data sufficient to accurately characterize employee exposures to respirable crystalline silica. 8 citations

(iii) Scheduled monitoring option. Open (d)(2)(iii) 10 citations

(A) The employer shall perform initial monitoring to assess the 8-hour TWA exposure for each employee on the basis of one or more personal breathing zone air samples that reflect the exposures of employees on each shift, for each job classification, in each work area. Where several employees perform the same tasks on the same shift and in the same work area, the employer may sample a representative fraction of these employees in order to meet this requirement. In representative sampling, the employer shall sample the employee(s) who are expected to have the highest exposure to respirable crystalline silica. 6 citations

(B) If initial monitoring indicates that employee exposures are below the action level, the employer may discontinue monitoring for those employees whose exposures are represented by such monitoring. Open (d)(2)(iii)(b)

(C) Where the most recent exposure monitoring indicates that employee exposures are at or above the action level but at or below the PEL, the employer shall repeat such monitoring within six months of the most recent monitoring.

(D) Where the most recent exposure monitoring indicates that employee exposures are above the PEL, the employer shall repeat such monitoring within three months of the most recent monitoring. 4 citations

(E) Where the most recent (non-initial) exposure monitoring indicates that employee exposures are below the action level, the employer shall repeat such monitoring within six months of the most recent monitoring until two consecutive measurements, taken seven or more days apart, are below the action level, at which time the employer may discontinue monitoring for those employees whose exposures are represented by such monitoring, except as otherwise provided in paragraph (d)(2)(iv) of this section. Open (d)(2)(iii)(e)

(iv) Reassessment of exposures. The employer shall reassess exposures whenever a change in the production, process, control equipment, personnel, or work practices may reasonably be expected to result in new or additional exposures at or above the action level, or when the employer has any reason to believe that new or additional exposures at or above the action level have occurred. 3 citations

(v) Methods of sample analysis. The employer shall ensure that all samples taken to satisfy the monitoring requirements of paragraph (d)(2) of this section are evaluated by a laboratory that analyzes air samples for respirable crystalline silica in accordance with the procedures in appendix A to this section. Open (d)(2)(v)

(vi) Employee notification of assessment results. Open (d)(2)(vi) 1 citations

(A) Within five working days after completing an exposure assessment in accordance with paragraph (d)(2) of this section, the employer shall individually notify each affected employee in writing of the results of that assessment or post the results in an appropriate location accessible to all affected employees. 1 citations

(B) Whenever an exposure assessment indicates that employee exposure is above the PEL, the employer shall describe in the written notification the corrective action being taken to reduce employee exposure to or below the PEL.

(vii) Observation of monitoring.

(A) Where air monitoring is performed to comply with the requirements of this section, the employer shall provide affected employees or their designated representatives an opportunity to observe any monitoring of employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica.

(B) When observation of monitoring requires entry into an area where the use of protective clothing or equipment is required for any workplace hazard, the employer shall provide the observer with protective clothing and equipment at no cost and shall ensure that the observer uses such clothing and equipment.

(3) Methods of compliance — Open (d)(3) 14 citations

(i) Engineering and work practice controls. The employer shall use engineering and work practice controls to reduce and maintain employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica to or below the PEL, unless the employer can demonstrate that such controls are not feasible. Wherever such feasible engineering and work practice controls are not sufficient to reduce employee exposure to or below the PEL, the employer shall nonetheless use them to reduce employee exposure to the lowest feasible level and shall supplement them with the use of respiratory protection that complies with the requirements of paragraph (e) of this section. Open (d)(3)(i) 14 citations

(ii) Abrasive blasting. In addition to the requirements of paragraph (d)(3)(i) of this section, the employer shall comply with other OSHA standards, when applicable, such as 29 CFR 1926.57 (Ventilation), where abrasive blasting is conducted using crystalline silica-containing blasting agents, or where abrasive blasting is conducted on substrates that contain crystalline silica.

Source: eCFR, text current as of 2026-10-15. Read all of 1926.1153.

Injuries linked to this rule

3 deaths are linked to inspections where OSHA cited 1926.1153(d).

Employee is struck by demo-saw blade and later dies
2024-11-01 · Fatal · AUBURN, NY

At 11:50 a.m. on November 1, 2024, Employee #1 was using a demo-saw to fit two sections of granite curbstone. The saw kicked back, causing the employee to losehis grip on the trigger with his right hand while the saw continued rotating in his left…

See all 3 cases

Full case list with employer, penalty, filters and download is part of OSHA Data (Purple Belt).

Unlock with Purple Belt

Where and how often it was cited

YearCitations
202357
2024236
2025247
2026154

Top states: MI (116), IL (102), GA (69), TX (58), KY (38)

Largest penalties

EmployerLocationPenalty for this rule
SUMMIT POLYMERS INCPORTAGE, MI$27,500
RESTORATION EAST, LLCBETHESDA, MD$26,250
CENTENNIAL CONCRETE & WATERPROOFING LLCLITTLETON, CO$19,359
MID-CONTINENTAL RESTORATION CO., INC.OKLAHOMA CITY, OK$18,688
RA MILLER CONSTRUCTION CO INCHAMILTON, OH$11,585

Free toolbox talk

A 5-minute crew talk on 1926.1153(d), plus alerts when this rule changes. Free.




OSHA interpretation letters

Related parts of this rule

Get your crew competent

Trainers on Black Belt Safety: Marc Harvey, Dana Reyes

Trainers and suppliers: feature your business on this rule for $25/month.

Frequently asked questions

When does 1926.1153(d) apply?

For tasks not listed in Table 1, or when the employer does not fully and properly implement the Table 1 controls.

What is the silica exposure limit?

50 micrograms per cubic meter of air, calculated as an 8-hour time-weighted average.

How often is monitoring repeated if exposures are above the limit?

Within three months of the most recent monitoring under the scheduled monitoring option.

About this page

Sources

3-year window. Federal OSHA only; state-plan rules are not counted. Plain-language text is a summary, not legal advice; the official text controls. Black Belt Safety is not part of OSHA or the Department of Labor.

Written and reviewed by

Black Belt Safety Editorial Team

Site Safety Officer and Safety Professional

OSHA 30 · CPR · USACE CQM

Written and reviewed by the Black Belt Safety team. Every post is checked against the OSHA standard or agency source it cites.

Desplácese hacia arriba