29 CFR 1910 · General Industry

1910.1027(d)(5)(ii): Notice When Cadmium Exceeds the PEL

By Black Belt Safety Editorial Team Official text as of October 15, 2026 Data updated October 22, 2026 3 min read

In plain words:

When monitoring shows employee exposure exceeds the PEL, the employer must state in the written notice that the PEL has been exceeded and describe the corrective action being taken to reduce exposure to or below the PEL.

Key takeaways

  • 1910.1027(d)(5)(ii) is part of OSHA's general industry standards (29 CFR Part 1910).
  • OSHA cited it 2 times in the last 3 years, in 2 inspections, with $7,235 in current penalties.
  • 1 death is linked to inspections that cited this rule.
  • Related part: 1910.1027(d) Exposure monitoring (21 citations).
  • Free 5-minute toolbox talk for your crew below.
2citations, 3 years
$7,235current penalties
2inspections
1linked deaths
In this article
  1. What this rule covers
  2. Official text
  3. Injuries linked to this rule
  4. Where and how often it was cited
  5. Free toolbox talk
  6. OSHA interpretation letters
  7. Related parts of this rule
  8. Get your crew competent
  9. Frequently asked questions
  10. About this page

What this rule covers

29 CFR 1910.1027(d)(5)(ii) is one requirement inside 1910.1027 Cadmium, an OSHA general industry standard (Part 1910). The official text below is copied word for word from the Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR). The numbers, injury cases and training on this page show how OSHA enforces it on real job sites.

Official text

(ii) Wherever monitoring results indicate that employee exposure exceeds the PEL, the employer shall include in the written notice a statement that the PEL has been exceeded and a description of the corrective action being taken by the employer to reduce employee exposure to or below the PEL. 2 citations

Source: eCFR, text current as of 2026-10-15. Read all of 1910.1027.

Injuries linked to this rule

1 death is linked to inspections where OSHA cited 1910.1027(d)(5)(ii).

Employee inhales plastic dust, later dies from pneumonia
2024-05-02 · Fatal · RIO RANCHO, NM

At 10:00 a.m. on February 23, 2024, an employee working as a machine operator for an aircraft parts manufacturer was working in the fabrication department. The employee inhaled plastic dust which led to the employee developing pneumonia. At 9:00 a.m. on May 2, 2024, the…

Where and how often it was cited

Free toolbox talk

A 5-minute crew talk on 1910.1027(d)(5)(ii), plus alerts when this rule changes. Free.




OSHA interpretation letters

None exist. OSHA has not published a letter of interpretation for 1910.1027(d)(5)(ii).

Related parts of this rule

Get your crew competent

Trainers on Black Belt Safety: Marc Harvey, Dana Reyes

Trainers and suppliers: feature your business on this rule for $25/month.

Frequently asked questions

When must this statement be included?

Wherever monitoring results indicate exposure exceeds the PEL.

What must the notice say?

That the PEL has been exceeded and what corrective action is being taken.

What is the goal of the corrective action?

To reduce employee exposure to or below the PEL.

About this page

Sources

3-year window. Federal OSHA only; state-plan rules are not counted. Plain-language text is a summary, not legal advice; the official text controls. Black Belt Safety is not part of OSHA or the Department of Labor.

Written and reviewed by

Black Belt Safety Editorial Team

Site Safety Officer and Safety Professional

OSHA 30 · CPR · USACE CQM

Written and reviewed by the Black Belt Safety team. Every post is checked against the OSHA standard or agency source it cites.

Scroll to top