1910.1027(d): Cadmium Exposure Monitoring
Employers covered by the cadmium standard must find out if any employee may be exposed at or above the action level, using breathing zone air samples that reflect each employee's regular 8-hour TWA exposure for each shift, job classification and work area. Representative sampling of the highest exposed employee is allowed for similar groups. Initial monitoring is required unless qualifying earlier monitoring after September 14, 1991, or objective data apply.
Key takeaways
- 1910.1027(d) is part of OSHA's general industry standards (29 CFR Part 1910).
- OSHA cited it 21 times in the last 3 years, in 18 inspections, with $55,187 in current penalties.
- 2 deaths are linked to inspections that cited this rule.
- Most citations: FL (4), OR (3), NM (3).
- Related part: 1910.1027(d)(1) General (13 citations).
- Free 5-minute toolbox talk for your crew below.
In this article
What this rule covers
29 CFR 1910.1027(d) ("Exposure monitoring") is one requirement inside 1910.1027 Cadmium, an OSHA general industry standard (Part 1910). It includes 16 sub-paragraphs. The official text below is copied word for word from the Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR). The numbers, injury cases and training on this page show how OSHA enforces it on real job sites.
Official text
(d) Exposure monitoring — 21 citations
(1) General. Open (d)(1) 13 citations
(i) Each employer who has a workplace or work operation covered by this section shall determine if any employee may be exposed to cadmium at or above the action level. 9 citations
(ii) Determinations of employee exposure shall be made from breathing zone air samples that reflect the monitored employee's regular, daily 8-hour TWA exposure to cadmium. 1 citations
(iii) Eight-hour TWA exposures shall be determined for each employee on the basis of one or more personal breathing zone air samples reflecting full shift exposure on each shift, for each job classification, in each work area. Where several employees perform the same job tasks, in the same job classification, on the same shift, in the same work area, and the length, duration, and level of cadmium exposures are similar, an employer may sample a representative fraction of the employees instead of all employees in order to meet this requirement. In representative sampling, the employer shall sample the employee(s) expected to have the highest cadmium exposures. 3 citations
(2) Specific. Open (d)(2) 4 citations
(i) Initial monitoring. Except as provided for in paragraphs (d)(2)(ii) and (d)(2)(iii) of this section, the employer shall monitor employee exposures and shall base initial determinations on the monitoring results. Open (d)(2)(i) 4 citations
(ii) Where the employer has monitored after September 14, 1991, under conditions that in all important aspects closely resemble those currently prevailing and where that monitoring satisfies all other requirements of this section, including the accuracy and confidence levels of paragraph (d)(6) of this section, the employer may rely on such earlier monitoring results to satisfy the requirements of paragraph (d)(2)(i) of this section.
(iii) Where the employer has objective data, as defined in paragraph (n)(2) of this section, demonstrating that employee exposure to cadmium will not exceed the action level under the expected conditions of processing, use, or handling, the employer may rely upon such data instead of implementing initial monitoring.
(3) Monitoring Frequency (periodic monitoring). Open (d)(3) 1 citations
(i) If the initial monitoring or periodic monitoring reveals employee exposures to be at or above the action level, the employer shall monitor at a frequency and pattern needed to represent the levels of exposure of employees and where exposures are above the PEL to assure the adequacy of respiratory selection and the effectiveness of engineering and work practice controls. However, such exposure monitoring shall be performed at least every six months. The employer, at a minimum, shall continue these semi-annual measurements unless and until the conditions set out in paragraph (d)(3)(ii) of this section are met. Open (d)(3)(i) 1 citations
(ii) If the initial monitoring or the periodic monitoring indicates that employee exposures are below the action level and that result is confirmed by the results of another monitoring taken at least seven days later, the employer may discontinue the monitoring for those employees whose exposures are represented by such monitoring.
(4) Additional Monitoring. The employer also shall institute the exposure monitoring required under paragraphs (d)(2)(i) and (d)(3) of this section whenever there has been a change in the raw materials, equipment, personnel, work practices, or finished products that may result in additional employees being exposed to cadmium at or above the action level or in employees already exposed to cadmium at or above the action level being exposed above the PEL, or whenever the employer has any reason to suspect that any other change might result in such further exposure.
(5) Employee Notification of Monitoring Results. Open (d)(5) 3 citations
(i) The employer must, within 15 working days after the receipt of the results of any monitoring performed under this section, notify each affected employee of these results either individually in writing or by posting the results in an appropriate location that is accessible to employees. Open (d)(5)(i) 1 citations
(ii) Wherever monitoring results indicate that employee exposure exceeds the PEL, the employer shall include in the written notice a statement that the PEL has been exceeded and a description of the corrective action being taken by the employer to reduce employee exposure to or below the PEL. Open (d)(5)(ii) 2 citations
(6) Accuracy of measurement. The employer shall use a method of monitoring and analysis that has an accuracy of not less than plus or minus 25 percent (±25%), with a confidence level of 95 percent, for airborne concentrations of cadmium at or above the action level, the permissible exposure limit (PEL), and the separate engineering control air limit (SECAL).
Source: eCFR, text current as of 2026-10-15. Read all of 1910.1027.
Injuries linked to this rule
2 deaths are linked to inspections where OSHA cited 1910.1027(d).
At 1:45 a.m. on November 6, 2024, an employee working for a solar power providerwas performing maintenance work on the C5. The employee collapsed and died from natural causes/heart attack.
Full case list with employer, penalty, filters and download is part of OSHA Data (Purple Belt).
Unlock with Purple BeltWhere and how often it was cited
| Year | Citations |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 7 |
| 2025 | 7 |
| 2026 | 7 |
Top states: FL (4), OR (3), NM (3), TX (2), WI (2)
Largest penalties
| Employer | Location | Penalty for this rule |
|---|---|---|
| FIRST SOLAR, INC. | TRINITY, AL | $10,050 |
| AERSALE COMPONENTS SOLUTIONS | RIO RANCHO, NM | $9,643 |
| GA TELESIS LANDING GEAR SERVICES, LLC | MIAMI, FL | $9,268 |
| OUTDOOR FURNITURE REFINISHING, INC. | HOUSTON, TX | $8,067 |
| GA TELESIS LANDING GEAR SERVICES, LLC | MIAMI, FL | $7,235 |
Free toolbox talk
A 5-minute crew talk on 1910.1027(d), plus alerts when this rule changes. Free.
OSHA interpretation letters
Related parts of this rule
- 1910.1027(d)(1) General 13 citations
- 1910.1027(d)(2)(i) 4 citations
- 1910.1027(d)(2) Specific 4 citations
- 1910.1027(d)(5) Employee Notification of Monitoring Results 3 citations
- 1910.1027(d)(5)(ii) 2 citations
- 1910.1027(d)(5)(i) 1 citations
- 1910.1027(d)(3)(i) 1 citations
- 1910.1027(d)(3) Monitoring Frequency (periodic monitoring) 1 citations
Get your crew competent
Trainers on Black Belt Safety: Marc Harvey, Dana Reyes
Trainers and suppliers: feature your business on this rule for $25/month.
Frequently asked questions
What must employers determine about cadmium?
Whether any employee may be exposed to cadmium at or above the action level.
How are exposures measured?
From personal breathing zone air samples reflecting full shift exposure on each shift, for each job classification, in each work area.
Can employers sample only some workers?
Yes, for groups with similar tasks and exposures, by sampling the employee(s) expected to have the highest exposures.
About this page
Sources
- 29 CFR 1910.1027 (eCFR), text current as of 2026-10-15
- U.S. Department of Labor enforcement data: OSHA inspections, citations and accident records, copied nightly; data as of 2026-10-22
3-year window. Federal OSHA only; state-plan rules are not counted. Plain-language text is a summary, not legal advice; the official text controls. Black Belt Safety is not part of OSHA or the Department of Labor.
